June 4, 2025
5
min read

Reality Check: Hype vs What Actually Works in AI for SOC

The AI revolution in security operations is here, but marketing promises far exceed current reality. After three decades building security software, the ground truth is clear: AI's value lies in augmentation, not replacement of SOC analysts. Real success comes from proven use cases. Large language models excel at unplaybooked investigations—where tier-2+ analysts struggle most without existing playbooks. AI removes investigative drudgery like log correlation and data extrapolation, keeping analysts cognitively focused instead of context-switching between mundane tasks. The most problematic messaging focuses on "time to resolve" and "replacing tier-1 analysts." Optimizing purely for speed creates dangerous tunnel vision. Risk reduction through thoroughness should be the primary goal—making the same mistake faster benefits no one. Successful adoption requires slotting AI into existing workflows, not overnight transformations. SOCs won't abandon tens of millions in infrastructure for new automation platforms. By 2025-end, adoption becomes mainstream. By 2027-2028, AI for SOC will be standard practice. Organizations understanding AI as augmentation—not replacement—will emerge significantly stronger in cybersecurity's biggest transformation since firewalls.

Alfred Huger
Cofounder & CPO
In this article

Introduction

The AI revolution in security operations is here, but the gap between marketing promises and ground truth is wider than most vendors would like to admit today. After three decades building security software and working directly with SOC teams implementing AI technologies, I've seen what actually works—and what doesn't.

Today, AI in the Security Operations Center (SOC) is awash with buzzwords. You hear about revolutionizing cybersecurity, autonomous everything, and an end to analyst toil. Some of that is on point; a lot of it is overly optimistic for where we stand today. My focus, and what I see delivering real value on the ground, is how AI genuinely helps us reduce risk. Everything else, while important, is a supporting actor to that primary goal.

Augmentation: The real promise of AI for SOC in 2025

AI's true value for the SOC lies in capability augmentation, not replacement. Most SOC analysts are SMEs in one or two narrow areas—typically endpoint security. AI rapidly expands their expertise across unfamiliar data sources while maintaining the same investigative outcomes. This means you can get everyone off the bench and into the game.

LLMs excel at removing investigative drudgery: log correlation, data extrapolation, and baseline analysis. This keeps analysts cognitively focused instead of context-switching between mundane tasks. AI also transforms report generation, enabling analysts to articulate issues to multiple stakeholders and dialogue with data sources without logging into dozens of different consoles.

Distinguishing marketing vs real impact

Security marketing consistently leans ahead of functionality, creating unrealistic expectations or jadedness. The most problematic messaging focuses exclusively on "time to resolve" and "replacing tier-1 analysts."

Time-saved metrics are valuable—security products are drowning teams in alerts, and alert fatigue is real. But optimizing purely for speed creates dangerous tunnel vision. When analysts are on the clock, expediency becomes everything, leading to narrow investigative scope and missed threats.

The messaging should emphasize thoroughness and skill development. Risk reduction is the ultimate goal of both SOCs and CISO organizations. Making the same mistake faster benefits no one. We haven't proven that AI judgment surpasses tier-1 analyst's judgment—but we have proven that the combination is powerful.

What's actually working in 2025

Real adoption success comes from specific, proven use cases:

  • Unplaybooked Investigations: Large language models excel as force multipliers for investigations without existing playbooks. This is where tier-2+ analysts struggle most—getting from A to Z without previous instructions. LLMs enable these investigations with higher fidelity and sensible timeframes.
  • Reasoning Through Alerts: The most effective approach has LLMs reason through investigations with analysts proving them out afterward. This combines the model's analytical power with human business context and case history knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Every investigation should produce a well-articulated, stakeholder-relevant document. LLMs make this standard practice instead of an exception reserved for full-blown IR incidents.

The state of adoption

Early challenges

Technology quality alone doesn't drive adoption. SOCs are complex environments constrained by existing technology investments, staff training, and budget cycles. Any solution must integrate with tens of millions in existing infrastructure—enterprises won't turf their entire SOC for relatively new automation platforms.

Successful adoption happens when organizations understand they must slot AI into existing workflows. Greenfield SOC rebuilds are rare. Most customers need gradual deployment and implementation projects, not overnight switches.

The commitment requires measurable, provable outcomes. Teams need retraining on new platforms, and results must be ruthlessly measured throughout the process.

The road to 2026-2027

By end of 2025, adoption will become mainstream as projects launch and platforms deploy. Real-world contact with production environments will mature these technologies rapidly. Most vendors in this space are relatively new—battle testing will separate effective solutions from enthusiastic marketing.

2026 will see genuine environmental transformation. By 2027-2028, AI for SOC will be standard practice.

The AGI transformation

AGI will enable close to machine-speed response and investigations—critical as both defenders and attackers gain access to the same innovations. The balance typically favors attackers initially.

True environmental defense requires AI embedded natively across all systems: HRMS platforms, email systems, every business application. Agentic technology will coordinate between systems to investigate, solve, remediate, and act upon security events in near real-time.

The SOC becomes an orchestrator, tuner, and arbiter rather than having humans involved in every investigation. This isn't controversial—it's inevitable. What we have now clearly isn't working, and we can't scale human involvement to match threat volume.

Moving beyond time-to-resolution

The industry obsesses over speed metrics while missing the bigger picture. Current SOC practices incentivize analysts to move faster without focusing on quality or scope expansion. We're pushing them toward smaller scopes to run faster, which doesn't deliver optimal results.

AI should relieve analysts from high-speed chases while enabling thorough investigations. The goal isn't just faster responses—it's better outcomes through comprehensive analysis powered by augmented capabilities.

Navigating a historic inflection point

This represents the biggest sea change in cybersecurity history. Network IPS/IDS, modern firewalls, EDR—none compare to the transformation we're witnessing. Those innovations aren't within visual distance of what's happening now.

We're entering a wild ride over the next three years. Organizations that understand AI as an augmentation tool rather than a replacement solution—and implement it thoughtfully within existing workflows—will emerge significantly stronger.

The key is moving beyond marketing hype to focus on proven capabilities: investigation augmentation, comprehensive reporting, and skill development. Risk reduction through better outcomes, not just faster ones.

Book a demo today to see how Command Zero can incorporate LLMs into your SOC flows today.  

Alfred Huger
Cofounder & CPO

Continue reading

AI
Highlight

Beyond Replacement: How AI Creates Super Analysts

After three years of AI implementations in security operations, the evidence is clear: artificial intelligence transforms SOC analysts into "super analysts" rather than replacing them. While AI excels at pattern recognition and data correlation, human analysts provide irreplaceable context, creative problem-solving, and ethical decision-making that automated systems cannot match. Command Zero's research across 352 cybersecurity professionals reveals that 88% of organizations face operational challenges from staff shortages—yet the solution lies in amplification, not replacement. Human analysts understand business context behind security alerts, conduct complex investigations requiring detective work, and manage stakeholder communications with emotional intelligence. The most sophisticated threats leverage human creativity through social engineering and novel attack vectors, demanding equally creative defensive strategies. By 2027-2028, AI-augmented security operations will become standard practice, but organizations recognizing AI as augmentation rather than replacement will emerge significantly stronger. The future belongs to human analysts empowered with AI superpowers, defining the next generation of cybersecurity excellence.
Eric Hulse
Jul 24, 2025
4
min read
AI
Highlight

The AI SOC Revolution: From Disparate Tools to Intelligent Defense

During my two decades defending networks and investigating threats, I've never witnessed transformation this profound. AI is revolutionizing security operations unlike any other tectonic shift has done before. Here’s why: Traditional SOCs are drowning—analysts face hundreds to thousands of daily alerts, investigating just 4%. The cognitive capacity crisis has reached breaking point. But AI isn't just better tooling; it's the emergence of truly intelligent defense systems that think, learn, and adapt at machine speed. While humans burn out correlating thousands of data points, investigating repetitive alert types and doing the same thing day in day out. AI can process more workload and never tire. The organizations embracing AI SOC today will dominate tomorrow's threat landscape. Those waiting for "perfect" solutions will defend against advanced threats with yesterday's capabilities. This isn't evolution—it's revolution.
Eric Hulse
Jul 17, 2025
6
min read
AI
Highlight

The Evolution of SOC Structure: From Rigid Tiers to Flexible Operations

Security Operations Centers are evolving from traditional three-tier analyst structures to more flexible, outcome-driven models. This comprehensive guide explores the benefits and challenges of tiered vs. tierless SOC approaches, examining how MDRs and MSPs are reshaping traditional hierarchies. Learn why tier one erosion is accelerating, how tierless models enable end-to-end case ownership, and the trade-offs between specialist expertise and operational flexibility. Discover how AI is transforming SOC operations by automating repetitive tasks and democratizing knowledge across analyst teams. Whether you're considering restructuring your SOC, evaluating outsourcing options, or implementing AI-powered investigations, this analysis provides actionable insights for security leaders. Expert perspective from 24+ years of industry experience covers practical considerations for organizations of all sizes, from compliance requirements to budget constraints.
Eric Hulse
Jun 26, 2025
4
min read
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.